Posts Tagged ‘books’

Love it!

Wed ,09/04/2014

I’m sure Ayn R. is burning down there right about now – or sneaking around like Uncle Screwtape, talking s*** into people’s ears… 🙂

SMBC

candybowl

Oh, Pete….!

Sun ,16/03/2014

Just finished reading Pete Townshend’s memoir Who I Am, which I got from Kerewin on my recent birthday.

Being a huge Who fan for at least a couple decades now and having read (or own) most of the Who bio-type books out there (Maximum R&B by Richard Barnes; Before I Get Old by Dave Marsh; Dear Boy: The Life of Keith Moon by Tony Fletcher; Full Moon by Peter “Dougal” Butler; countless other Mojo and similar articles) I’ve read a lot about them besides enjoying their music, and am familiar with much of their history, successes and demons over time.

But this book is quite different, no doubt intended that way by Townshend – it’s much more personal and revealing, and to me, not always in a good way – but again, as implied or outright stated by Townshend in the book in several places, that’s exactly the way he wanted it.

On the plus side, you get to see a fairly different view of The Who and its principal songwriter. The Keith Moon books (Butler, Fletcher) paint a varied picture of a semi-fulltime lunatic who played drums brilliantly at his peak, but sunk pretty low or perpetually lived in a fantasy land when not, often to the sometimes extreme detriment of those around him. There is no real book directly dealing with John Entwistle or Roger Daltrey that I know of, and as the former is sadly dead, besides possibly a book on his massively powerful and influential bass-playing, I suspect there won’t be – Roger of course can still write his and may be in fact doing so, not sure. Both Dave Marsh and Richard Barnes give a pretty good look at Roger in their books, however.

And so we come to Pete, who ended up being the creative driving force behind the band over time and arguably the real engine behind its success. In this book Pete tries to come to grips with many personal demons in explaining his life story and role in The Who’s peaks and valleys, and confesses to being a potential cause of several of the latter. And it was nice to see – say by comparison to the recent Ginger Baker movie I watched – that he usually takes responsibility for his failures, even if he doesn’t always learn from them (womanizing, drugs, booze). He even calls himself a self-obsessed prat at intervals depending on the story he’s telling.

For me a bit of downside came in all the womanizing – sure, he had a tough childhood – much tougher than I knew of, and fraught with loneliness and alienation from his flaky/lame parents – And surely being married at 25 with two kids amid crazy sudden fame and pressure to keep delivering hits might drive anyone mad. But, I still don’t see why he got married if he was going to carry on with groupies while on the road with the band? Surely any/all rock star womanizing isn’t ‘good’ anyway generally – but at least those who aren’t married aren’t kidding themselves (and those they fool around with), either? Just seems extremely lame to me.

The alcohol and drug abuse – pretty par for the court in the rock world of that time (and since), and most of Pete’s contemporaries went through much of the same, including most of The Who and its surrounding posse. But despite knowing a lot about and being a fan of Pete and The Who, this whole ‘user/abuser’ scenario is simply so outside my experience, I really can’t relate to it. I’m just glad he survived it, even if a lot of it was his own doing.

I guess I would have liked knowing more about his inner thinking when writing songs – I felt I got glimpses of it here and there but the book is more a story about experiences and consequence (to me, anyway) than about methods. And perhaps that stuff is too hard to put on paper, or simply too hard/too private to put in even a memoir. I would have also liked to know more about his usage and experimentation with sounds, synthesizers and the like – he mentions them all the time in passing, but doesn’t provide much detail.

I think the final conclusion for me is/was that Pete is very human, with all the positives and negatives that can come from same – I’m thankful for the great music he’s created with The Who, and still remain a huge fan – even at his worst – he still kicks a**!

Other thoughts on the book:
Wikipedia
American Songwriter
LA Times
Rolling Stone

candybowl

The Everything Store.

Mon ,17/02/2014

So I saw a recent GeekWire post by local VC Nick Hanauer about Amazon:

Early Amazon.com investor says online retailer ‘probably destroyed a million jobs’

which is a nice segue to talking about the recent Amazon ‘bio’ by Brad Stone, The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon. I finished reading this book last week – it’s a quick, informative and somewhat tell-all jaunt through Amazon’s history to date, focusing most closely on Jeff Bezos of course.

Having read the Steve Jobs book last year, there are a number of similarities, but also, key important differences between these two leaders and their respective companies.

While in both cases, each book had the tacit approval of its centerpiece, the Jobs book was done in far more direct cooperation than this one. Bezos never sat down with Brad Stone to review all these points and/or approve the manuscript himself prior to publication – but at the same time, he didn’t really stand in its way, either, and provided some key interviews as it developed, albeit not necessarily intended at the time to end up in a book later. Both Bezos and Jobs come across as extremely driven, sometimes focused on seemingly the tiniest minutiae (that can appear from the outside or in hindsight sometimes as misdirected vs. the bigger picture), and they both exhibit hyper, sometimes abusive mgmt styles that aren’t unique to the tech industry by any means, but it sure seems to draw these traits out more often than not, IMHO.

A contrast between the two, however is that Jobs perenially sought outside approval and support as a tastemaker, innovator and to be lionized as a tech industry leader in the products he created, oversaw or ‘appropriated’ (e.g. the Mac’s mouse-driven user interface) as he went along – Bezos arguably never did (or does). Bezos seems completely, utterly focused on one thing: his customers. And Bezos keeps his cards far closer to the vest in nearly everything he does (Amazon or otherwise), although given Amazon’s size now, that’s much more difficult than it might have been in the formative years – they are in many ways as big as Apple, Microsoft and other large tech rivals and their influence ranges even more broadly outside the tech industry (ask Walmart or other retail rivals – ask other cloud providers – the list goes on).

My reactions to this book were similar to that of the Jobs book – I felt it was pretty balanced, although possibly a little less sympathetic to Bezos than Isaacson was to Jobs – likely because Stone didn’t have the longterm journalistic relationship to Bezos that WI had with Jobs. I like that it tries to understand Bezos’ background (personal and professional) explaining him as a person and exploring his motivations – but with this guy, it’s far less obvious and far harder to do that in the end – Bezos is just more enigmatic and probably on purpose. Plus, while somewhat comfortable in the spotlight, he probably doesn’t deep down care about it much, again unlike Jobs. Neither person was/is a triumph of philanthropy – Apple only came to it after Jobs passed, Amazon arguably still has yet to. But contrast that with Bill Gates who also came to it (in a big, big way, to be fair) after he had relinquished nearly all major control over Microsoft to found the Gates Foundation. And if you look back at moguls like Carnegie and the like – same deal. They use the later philanthropy to burnish and in some ways, re-imagine, their own past legacy in the marketplace. Whether we completely believe them or give them the benefit of the doubt is certainly up to us.

I had also read the Mike Daisey book about Amazon of several years ago (2002), but now having read this one, I think I’ll go read that one again to look a bit closer from the perspective of an employee in the trenches, as was Daisey at the time he worked there (1998, fairly early on).

But getting back to this book – to sum up, I liked the book, I (again) concluded I still don’t want to work at Amazon, I respect what they’ve built, and I think it could have been done in many ways with nearly the same focus on the market but not at the expense of some of its employees along the way. And I realize I’m looking at it in hindsight and from the outside – your perspective may vary. Bezos doesn’t seem too different than most titans of tech (or other industries) to me – likely often the smartest person in the room, possibly not the guy you want to go camping with? He’s still a big enigma in many ways….maybe that will be explained in the next book about him…..

candybowl

dilbertTags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Everything Store.

Marvel Anime – X-Men.

Sun ,10/11/2013

Was headed out of the library last week and saw a Marvel Anime of the X-Men on the shelf, so checked it out. Just finished watching it this am – and had some interesting reactions.

First, I’m not an X-Men expert by any means. I’ve seen the movies, and recently read an anthology reprint of some very old X-Men comics I read as a kid, but otherwise nada mucho. As far as the movies went, I liked the first two better than the third one, which I felt kind of squandered things to a degree character-wise into just action and mayhem (maybe due to different director, not sure). Then the X-Men First Class movie came out – which I liked more, although Kevin Bacon’s villain was fairly ridiculous (while entertaining, to be sure).

I guess one of the challenges in following any of these comic stories, characters, ‘teams’, etc. at this point is that so many of the plots, counter-plots, stories, etc. have been either done so many times or sent in one direction, then another, then another new writer steps in and takes it in a different direction (thinking of the recent Marvel Knights X-Men series I watched, in addition to the JJ Abrams ‘redo’ of Star Trek in the two recent movies, etc.) at some point you have to simply give up on a linear history of *any* character and just enjoy the story for what it is or tries to do.

So in talking about this X-Men anime – I liked the fact that they had yet another team of obscure weirdos to battle (the ‘U-Men’) and that ultimately there was another team of ‘evil’ Mutants – the Inner Circle – to deal with too. The animation is very well done, and there are obvious nods to the movies in some of the presentation and implied plot points (at least to me). However, there are also a number of times where there’s either too much mindless violence that transitions to a plot stoppage where everyone sits and ‘monologues’ too much, and at least two to three key points where characters who have certain knowledge don’t say anything, don’t act as you’d expect them to, and then the plot moves forward irrespective (this is otherwise known as a ‘plot hole’ :(). And yet again, certain X-Men seem far weaker here than otherwise implied – most notably Storm (who got her a** kicked far too many times in the movies too vs. her implied power?) – so that’s a problem. Am I reading too much into this? Probably. Another gripe (although this is anime, after all so not a complete surprise) is that nearly every woman in this thing is drawn as if she was first seen in Ghost in the Shell – and if you’ve seen that movie or series, you know what I’m talking about. It just doesn’t work here, guys.

I guess to sum up, if you like X-Men and have more nerdy knowledge about all the myriad characters and history of same, you will probably like this too. I liked it, but didn’t like it as much as I *should* have, which is disappointing. If I had to choose, I’d pick the Marvel Knights series…..

candybowl

Retro sci-fi art/inspired/etc.

Sun ,27/10/2013

So over the past few years I’ve seen an increasing trend (news to nobody I’m sure) of retro art inspired by previous art. That is, you have ‘fake’ movie posters or wholly new ‘ads’ for TV series re-imagined, like the book imaged below, which I saw in a Barnes & Noble recently (and was able to resist buying it, even!).

I’m sure the myriad of artists on Etsy have long been in this game, came across some cool recent examples there, too:

The Geekerie

Sci fi movie pulp covers

Star Trek: The Art of Juan Ortiz
Juan Ortiz
(a few more pics)

candybowl

And….scene.

Mon ,14/10/2013

Finished the (currently) last Alex Verus novel, Chosen, a week or so ago. And then found out that this novel only came out this past August, which means i’m in for a wait on any future books – doh!

The book continues the saga of Alex Verus, London-based mage and diviner extraordinaire, and his growing posse of friends/apprentices, Luna, Anne, Sonder and Variam, with some of the usual nemeses, and some new/old ones to be reckoned with.

Again, no interest in spoilers here, so what I will say instead is that this seems the grittiest of the four novels so far. Alex is forced into some harder choices than seen previously and confronts several demons/skeletons in his closet along the way. And some of the mental expectations you have of the story at the start take some definite twists and turns you may or may not expect. A great continuation of the series and VERY much looking forward to the next one!

In the meantime, the next Clone book is coming out at the end of the month from Steven L. Kent; and I found The Dresden Files on DVD at the library which I can watch in the meantime, too. 🙂

candybowl

a. MEN!

Mon ,07/10/2013

Savage Chickens

candybowl

Alex Verus, parts 2 and 3.

Sat ,28/09/2013

As noted previously, I am now offiically addicted to Alex Verus books – just finished the 2nd (Cursed) and 3rd (Taken) books, awaiting the fourth, Chosen. I just can’t put these things down once I start them – very entertaining and engaging!

As before, Alex Verus is a mage (wizard or warlock) who lives in London and walks a fine line between Light and Dark mages (and other occasional magical entities who pop in) while trying to keep out of ‘magic politics’ and train his apprentice and friend, Luna. The books have a good level of back-story without getting to the detail level of say, Lord of the Rings, where you then have to go into epic backstory and bog things down too much. I like the way details are revealed as needed, which if not used carefully can look too convenient (side rant – Star Trek holodeck screenwriters, I’m talking to YOU) but here Alex is portrayed as many times out of his league compared to other mages and also battling with self-esteem and confidence issues along the way.

Check out the books – you won’t be disappointed!

candybowl

Verus…..Alex Verus

Fri ,20/09/2013

Just finished Benedict Jacka‘s Fated novel today – the first in his Alex Verus series. Definitely an engaging read!

While I’m not a big fantasy person – about the closest I usually come is time-honored (but sadly still far too obscure) Clark Ashton Smith and HP Lovecraft (neither of which aren’t strictly fantasy – CAH is equally sci-fi in his weird way; HPL is much more horror-tinged than straight fantasy), this was a fast and fun read. I have read at least one Harry Dresden novel, in the same ‘modern magic’ category and liked it, but then forgot to go back to read more – my bad.

Mr Verus is a modern mage (wizard or warlock) that lives in London and tries to keep to himself and out of trouble, given his sordid past. But like all such anti-heroes, he gets drawn in anyway, much to the reader’s delight. I liked the mix of descriptive prose vs. action, and the pacing of the novel keeps you rolling right along until the penultimate stages, to be sure. I liked the effort to paint the Dark Mages as a mixed bag, not quite just straight evil as they could be in a simpler tale, but certainly very dangerous all the same – and the Light certainly not being what they seem either. I’m not going to reveal any more plot but there were some good twists in there too.

I guess I’ll have to go back and read more Harry Dresden now too – but first to finish the other three AV books! 🙂

candybowl

Esteban, Yobs.

Sat ,06/07/2013

So we went camping with relatives last weekend, what a great time! And during part of that time, I finally had the chance to start reading the recent Steve Jobs bio from Walter Isaacson that I got for christmas last year. This was an interesting read, if you like biographies, but I had mixed reactions to it, for the following reasons.

1) Much of the story was already familiar to me, as I grew up with those original Macs (and Amigas, and PCs, etc.) and have used most of them along the way at some point or another (I have an older Mac Pro at present, among my other bazillion computers at home). I am not a zealous Mac fanboy by any means, they serve their purpose and definitely do it well. My notable Mac gripes are beyond the scope of this review, so I’ll leave those out. I am glad they are still around, as much to keep Micro$oft honest (because Windows still sucks for the most part) as to point out what you can really do when you push hard for design and integration in a consumer OS, even when you arguably don’t have to.

2) While reading the book, it’s obvious Isaacson has made strong efforts to be balanced, even though it’s just as clear he’s a big Jobs fanboy from the very start. So while he is happy to show many (because sadly there are many) instances of Jobs being a huge jerk, Jobs being irresponsible, Jobs lording it over everyone around him, etc. – there are just as many triumphs along the way, and those are put on equal display. Some of them I think are a little overblown or hyped in a way that I would more expect to see in a press release, but this is definitely not a book that avoids showing the bad side of Jobs, and that’s a good thing.

3) One factor here I am not sure is brought out as much as it could have been is the luck factor. Like so many successful business types, regardless of industry, to hear them tell it, you’d think they planned their ridiculous success from the minute they were born and it was simply fate that led them to the pinnacle. But anyone paying actual attention knows that LUCK plays a huge part in these stories as well.

It’s true that highly focused, smart people like Jobs and similar are often the best-equipped to take overwhelming advantage of chances that come their way – and in Jobs’ case, his ‘reality distortion field’ often permitted him in many cases (but not in the end with cancer, certainly) to push his way through obstacles to create the reality he wanted and believed in. In some ways, he was both the Immovable Object or the Irresistible Force no matter what he did, because the guy simply didn’t budge. Period. But he was also very, very lucky – you can argue both sides of many of his successes that he was the key driver – but he was also just as much riding on the success of the team(s) that supported him. And (noted in the book somewhat too) if it wasn’t for the iPod (and to a lesser degree, iTunes), the second coming of Apple might have turned out very differently (because they would have ended up as part of Oracle or Sun, most likely, and possibly not even around anymore). The iPod gave them the crazy money and breathing room to really aim for the stars again, even with the Mac OS X reboot beforehand. That would never have been enough on its own.

4) One of the more interesting aspects to me about this story is of course the contrast between Bill Gates and Jobs, which isn’t the focus of the book but certainly comes up several times. And if you’ve ever watched Pirates of Silicon Valley, you’ve seen this scenario play out – arguably not really exaggerated for effect even in the movie – where Jobs gets karma put right back in his face by Gates in a direct, undeniable way. Possibly one of the few times it really happened, when you consider the book and story as a whole. Here Gates is painted a bit more nice than Jobs – but I’d wager he was just as hard to deal with and just as ‘cornholio’ in his own way – ask the crushed and discarded Micro$oft ‘partners’ or early computer companies along the way that were run over by far worse business practices than Apple ever came up with. There’s plenty of abusive behavior to go around when these kinds of stakes are at issue, and it’s certainly not confined to the tech industry, either. Ask the banks, for example.

So do I admire Steve Jobs? I admire several of his character traits – the drive, the focus, the willingness to sacrifice so much to stick to his vision in many cases, the willingness to be the lone voice even in his NeXT years, where he literally *was* the lone voice for his beliefs. And I am glad he played a central role in bringing us Pixar, a story I knew only a little about beforehand but the book tells in great detail.

But I have seen SJ’s hyper-abusive management style at work even in my own career, and it greatly tempers my admiration for his success in the end. No one has to behave that way to be successful, and there are plenty of examples out there that prove my point. It’s truly sad that so many leaders in Corporate America believe otherwise. But as SJ found out, karma is real, guys – change your ways while you still can!

And I’m not completely convinced that designing cool consumer devices (computers or otherwise) is ‘changing the world’ the way Jobs constantly evangelizes. Because changing or enriching consumer behavior is one thing – but really changing society for the better is quite another, and I’m not convinced that (just) building cool technology is a necessary means to that end. I think that it is a uniquely *American* viewpoint to believe and centralize that perspective, but the era of ‘what’s good for GM is good for America’ is long, long since past, and the same applies for Apple.

A great read and great fodder for beer-table debate, to be sure. Especially if you have an Apple or Micro$oft (yes, somehow they too exist) fanboy in your midst. 🙂

candybowl